CO129-395 - Public Offices - 1912 — Page 482

27200).

merly Were Hurst

JIN.

27/eet

478

Sir H. de Saumarez's notes on the

Hong Kong Companies Ordinances, 1911.

u

ce for the prespion of the awaiting out! went nest accontinere," the one.

Section 1 (3).

Subs (3) ought to be repealed. It is most un-

desirable that the Courts in Hongkong or Shanghai

should make orders which they cannot enforce because

the person against whom they are made is in the juris-

diction of the other Court, the application should be

made direct to the Court having jurisdiction.

I do not suppose that the subs: was enacted for

any other purpose than to meet Sir F. Piggott's judg-

ment.

Section 3.

"or without" to be modified in case of China

Companies.

Section 4 (1) (ii).

After Colony "or China".

It is essential that the registered office of

companies doing business solely in China should be in)

China. It would be a matter for the Order-in-Council

to say at what ports such office might be, clearly

Treaty Port, otherwise Chinese Companies masqueradi)